What
is Munchausen syndrome by proxy? |
BBC R4- Today programme BBC REPORTER: Taking a child away from it parents after allegations of abuse is an extreme step. It causes agony for the parents and also in many cases for the child. When this happens one ought to confident that every effort has been taken to ensure the allegations are well founded, particularly when they involve Munchausen syndrome by proxy. This controversial theory was first identified in 1977 by Professor Sir Roy Meadow, and has been called into questions in recent high profile appeals, such as the Sally Clark and Angela Cannings cases. John Sweeney reports on a disturbing case. JOHN SWEENEY: They called it Operation Whatley – covert video surveillance carried out by six former Special Forces officers and ex policemen not against the IRA or Al Qaeda, but against a mother. She was, according to the paperwork suffering from Munchausen’s disease. They were spying on to check whether she was complying with a court order restricting the amount of time she could spend with her child. But Mumtaz, we changed her name for legal reasons, denies that she hurt he baby. MUMTAZ: I never did anything to my harm my child. JOHN SWEENEY: Her
baby now 2 suffered five seizures in the first four months. She went
blue in the face, her muscles went floppy and she appeared to stop
breathing. A report by Dr Paul Davis, a leading expert on
Munchausen syndrome by proxy, a theory about child abuse first
discovered by controversial expert witness Professor Sir Roy Meadow,
said otherwise. Dr Davis cited Munchausen syndrome by proxy 31
times in his reports on Mumtaz. He concluded that: UNKNOWN SPEAKER READING FROM DR DAVIS’ REPORT: This is not a classical case of Munchausen syndrome by proxy JOHN SWEENEY: Baby Karma had suffered UNKNOWN SPEAKER READING FROM DR DAVIS’ REPORT: Imposed upper airway obstruction. JOHN SWEENEY: And
he stated. UNKNOWN SPEAKER READING FROM DR DAVIS’
REPORT: It seems the perpetrator must have been
the mother. BIRMINGHAM SOCIAL
SERVICES: The mother has not been diagnosed as having
Munchausen syndrome by proxy JOHN SWEENEY:
However the surveillance team who spied on Mumtaz appeared to have
told the opposite. The surveillance reports states: UNKNOWN SPEAKER READING FROM
SURRVEILLANCE REPORT: She suffers from
Munchausen’s disease. MUMTAZ: He
attacked us. He made this report saying that I smothered my
child. But how dare he make a report without meeting us and
knowing what kind of people we are, how we are towards our child.
He just read the notes and went ahead and started saying that I tried
to do this and I tried to smothered her. He is just so wrong. JOHN SWEENEY: In
paragraph one, point one of his report Dr Davis says: UNKNOWN SPEAKER READING FROM DR DAVIS’
REPORT: I have not met any of the parties or
examined Karma and did not consider it necessary to do so. JOHN SWEENEY:
We asked Birmingham social services, “Was it best practice for a
doctor to make a diagnosis without meeting a patient?” They
said the question was irrelevant to the case. The second
complaint made by Mumtaz is that Dr Davis did not investigate her
family history. MUMTAZ:
On my side of the family, there’s 24 sudden infant deaths, that’s
over four generations. My sister’s son had breathing
difficulties when he was younger, floppiness, colour change. My
husband’s family have nine sudden infant deaths. His brother
had similar symptoms when he was one month old and his daughter as
well had the similar symptoms. There could have been a genetic
thing within Karma. JOHN SWEENEY:
Birmingham social services say: JOHN SWEENEY: The third complaint made by Mumtaz is that when Dr Davis made his probable finding that she must have tried to smother her baby four times, he downplayed the significance of a potentially lethal bug, Rotavirus. She says that her baby suffered a fifth attacked and she could not possibly have caused it, because she wasn’t there when the baby feel ill. Dr Davis agreed: UNKNOWN SPEAKER READING FROM DR DAVIS’
REPORT: On this admission, baby Karma was
clearly unwell. Slightly mottled with a high fever. A
common virus was identified in stools. So there is every
indication that this episode was related to a genuine episode of
illness. DR DAVID DRUCKER: If
as I understand, the virus was accepted as the cause of the problem in
the fifth attack. Then I think there have to be very good
reasons for not seriously considering it as an explanation for the
third attack. JOHN SWEENEY: Do you think it’s possible that this mother has been a victim of a miscarriage of justice? DR DAVID DRUCKER: Yes, because we know in several instances, some of the investigations that might have been carried out, weren’t carried out. JOHN SWEENEY: What do you think of Dr Davis’ conclusion, it seems that the perpetrator must have been the mother? DR DAVID DRUCKER: This would worry me, if he’s starting out from the point of view, there has to be perpetrator and there can’t be a natural cause. JOHN SWEENEY: Dr Davis declined to comment. Birmingham social services planned to have Karma adopted permanently. In the meantime, in the scrupulously clean home of Mumtaz and her husband, there is an empty bedroom. She told me how often she thought about her child. MUMTAZ: All the
time, every second of the day. I just want her home. BBC REPORTER: And
that report was from John Sweeney.
|